Premium Content Waitlist Banner

Digital Product Studio

4 Reasons Why AI Won’t Replace Copywriters

4 Reasons why AI won't replace Copywriters

Are you worried about Artificial Intelligence taking over your Copywriting job? Whenever there is a new launch in the robotic industry, everyone who sells their skills online gets insecure. Well, if you are one of the professional Copywriters then you don’t need to worry about anything.

All you need to believe is that AI tools are only here to help, not to take over!

Whereas, there are multiple industries that are mostly filled up by AI products such as;

Many giant businessmen prefer AI products as they cost them low and are long-lasting. However, if we talk about writing, See generating content as an art, and there is no replacement for it, Period!

To bring more authenticity to this statement, we have written a few of the top 4 reasons why AI writing won’t replace Copywriters.

Here are the Reasons Why AI Won’t Replace Copywriters

Take a look at these valid points and share your views in the comment section below.

1. Lack of Creativity

Any content or copy written by AI programs lacks creativity, Why? Because it has limited access to the data and information placed on the Internet. 

4 Reasons why AI won't replace Copywriters
4 Reasons why AI won’t replace Copywriters

Such as, if any of the human Copywriters craft a copy, it includes some reference points through Social media and embeds links from authentic websites. And much more that can attract their audience. 

AI-generated content always feels robotic, and it doesn’t appeal much to the audience. However, it majorly lacks;

  • Slogans 
  • Business Web References
  • Social Media Posts

2. Art of Storytelling in Human Copywriters

The Art of Storytelling and Empathy is the critical part of writing. It’s understood that AI tools can’t win when it comes to storytelling. However, human copywriters resonate with the emotion that goes perfectly with the flow of your Copy. 

Either it should be Exciting, Happy, or Fearful; human knows how to make content appealing correctly.

3. Building Engagement

All around the world, Copywriters know-how creating engaging content is necessary. They understand the importance of building an engagement with the visitors. AI Programs are unable to engage effectively, as they are more straight with the writing.

However, Copywriters adapt the environment, and the current ongoing events and make it more Raw so that their audience can enjoy and wants to come again.  

Moreover, an environment where machines and humans collaborate for work is way better than only AI services.

4. Affordability

It’s obvious that AI tools are expensive yet fancy. The companies such as OpenAI have spent billions of dollars to create a tool that includes;

  • Idea
  • Building 
  • Launch
  • Bar Exam
  • Marketing 

There is a massive team existing behind the doors which serves continuously to create such immense products. The team consists of Professional Data Scientists, Engineers, and Developers. 

However, it is affordable to hire any of the copywriters; no doubt they come in budget and suit your pocket, whereas AI doesn’t!

Frequently Asked Questions

Now, let’s move on to the most frequently asked questions about Writing, Content, and AI.

Why can’t AI replace writers?

Well, there are various reasons why AI can’t replace Writers. Primarily, because of the generation of Novel Ideas and the Concepts behind detailed fictional stories that can only be occurred by a human brain. However the essence of emotions, thrill, and in-depth feelings can not be expressed by AI.

What is the problem with AI Copywriters?

One thing that needs to be significantly clear is that AI cannot create. If you choose any of the Artificial Intelligence Copywriters it would never generate fresh and unplagiarized content. 

It only takes examples from the existing content, conducts quick research on the Internet. And present you with some attractive words that track most of the community. So clearly, AI creates content from the Content online written by humans. 

What problem do Copywriters solve?

So Copywriters are appointed to not only increase business traffic or conversion rate. However, it is used for plenty of other problems solving, such as creating;

  • High Quality & Compelling Copy’
  • Building Trust
  • Strong Reputation
  • Address Pain point of Consumers

Will AI writers replace human content writers in the foreseeable future?

AI writers have got so much more advanced lately. Yet it can only be used best for generating Basic Social Media Captions, Content, and Text. Even after so much inclusion to advanced technology, it still lacks Empathy and Creativity in the content. 

This is why it can’t replace human content writers in the future. As we can see, there is a number of tools used to recognize ChatGPT or AI Generated Content, and already millions of users exist in it.

What are the disadvantages of AI Copywriters?

The biggest disadvantage is that Artificial Intelligence needs the assistance of humans. So that AI can touch the proficiency in their work. Undoubtedly AI has improvised a lot, and it has reached a surface, which is just beyond the limits. But somehow, it has been making some major Composition Mistakes, Non-Structured and Grammatical errors in its content. 

Bottom Line

No doubt, there are plenty of businesses and startups that are opting for AI Writing Tools. Most of the Entrepreneurs are enjoying it because they don’t have to pay anything more than a subscription cost.

But still, there is a huge room for professionals. Even we have already entered an era where every other day we are experiencing the latest AI Models. Hence millions of people are looking for proficient Copywriters that can work on the most relatable strategies to attract the right audience.

Moreover, We at DigiAlps are a team of Web-developers. We have already worked with a number of clients those who were searching for professional web designers for their businesses. So if you are also starting out new, Ping us Now!

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Stay updated with the latest news and exclusive offers!


* indicates required
Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

AI-Generated Book Scandal: Chicago Sun-Times Caught Publishing Fakes

AI-Generated Book Scandal: Chicago Sun-Times Caught Publishing Fakes

Here are four key takeaways from the article:

  1. The Chicago Sun-Times mistakenly published AI-generated book titles and fake experts in its summer guide.
  2. Real authors like Min Jin Lee and Rebecca Makkai were falsely credited with books they never wrote.
  3. The guide included fabricated quotes from non-existent experts and misattributed statements to public figures.
  4. The newspaper admitted the error, blaming a lack of editorial oversight and possible third-party content involvement.

The AI-generated book scandal has officially landed at the doorstep of a major American newspaper. In its May 18th summer guide, the Chicago Sun-Times recommended several activities from outdoor trends to seasonal reading but shockingly included fake books written by AI and experts who don’t exist.

Fake Books, Real Authors: What Went Wrong?

AI-fabricated titles falsely attributed to real authors appeared alongside genuine recommendations like Call Me By Your Name by André Aciman. Readers were shocked to find fictional novels such as:

  • “Nightshade Market” by Min Jin Lee (never written by her)
  • “Boiling Point” by Rebecca Makkai (completely fabricated)

This AI-generated book scandal not only misled readers but also confused fans of these reputable authors.

Experts Who Don’t Exist: The AI Hallucination Deepens

The paper’s guide didn’t just promote fake books. Articles also quoted nonexistent experts:

  • “Dr. Jennifer Campos, University of Colorado” – No such academic found.
  • “Dr. Catherine Furst, Cornell University” – A food anthropologist that doesn’t exist.
  • “2023 report by Eagles Nest Outfitters” – Nowhere to be found online.

Even quotes attributed to Padma Lakshmi appear to be made up.

Blame Game Begins: Was This Sponsored AI Content?

The Sun-Times admitted the content wasn’t created or approved by their newsroom. Victor Lim, their senior director, called it “unacceptable.” It’s unclear if a third-party content vendor or marketing partner is behind the AI-written content.

We are looking into how this made it into print as we speak. It is not editorial content and was not created by, or approved by, the Sun-Times newsroom. We value your trust in our reporting and take this very seriously. More info will be provided soon.

Chicago Sun-Times (@chicago.suntimes.com) 2025-05-20T14:19:10.366Z

Journalist Admits Using AI, Says He Didn’t Double-Check

Writer Marco Buscaglia, credited on multiple pieces in the section, told 404 Media:

“This time, I did not [fact-check], and I can’t believe I missed it. No excuses.”

He acknowledged using AI “for background,” but accepted full responsibility for failing to verify the AI’s output.

AI Journalism Scandals Are Spreading Fast

This isn’t an isolated case. Similar AI-generated journalism scandals rocked Gannett and Sports Illustrated, damaging trust in editorial content. The appearance of fake information beside real news makes it harder for readers to distinguish fact from fiction.

Conclusion: Newsrooms Must Wake Up to the Risks

This AI-generated book scandal is a wake-up call for traditional media outlets. Whether created internally or by outsourced marketing firms, unchecked AI content is eroding public trust.

Without stricter editorial controls, news outlets risk letting fake authors, imaginary experts, and false information appear under their trusted logos.

| Latest From Us

Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Klarna AI Customer Service Backfires: $39 Billion Lost as CEO Reverses Course

Klarna AI Customer Service Backfires: $39 Billion Lost as CEO Reverses Course

Here are four key takeaways from the article:

  1. Klarna’s AI customer service failed, prompting CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski to admit quality had dropped.
  2. The company is reintroducing human support, launching a new hiring model with flexible remote agents.
  3. Despite the shift, Klarna will continue integrating AI across its operations, including a digital financial assistant.
  4. Klarna’s valuation plunged from $45.6B to $6.7B, partly due to over-reliance on automation and market volatility.

Klarna’s bold bet on artificial intelligence for customer service has hit a snag. The fintech giant’s CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, has admitted that automating support at scale led to a drop in service quality. Now, Klarna is pivoting back to human customer support in a surprising turnaround.

“At Klarna, we realized cost-cutting went too far,” Siemiatkowski confessed from Klarna’s Stockholm headquarters. “When cost becomes the main factor, quality suffers. Investing in human support is the future.”

Human Touch Makes a Comeback

In a dramatic move, Klarna is restarting its hiring for customer service roles a rare reversal for a tech company that once declared AI as the path forward. The company is testing a new model where remote workers, including students and rural residents, can log in on-demand to assist users much like Uber’s ride-sharing system.

“We know many of our customers are passionate about Klarna,” the CEO said. “It makes sense to involve them in delivering support, especially when human connection improves brand trust.”

Klarna Still Backs AI Just Not for Everything

Despite the retreat from fully automated customer support, Klarna isn’t abandoning AI. The company is rebuilding its tech stack with AI at the core. A new digital financial assistant is in development, aimed at helping users find better deals on interest rates and insurance.

Siemiatkowski also reaffirmed Klarna’s strong relationship with OpenAI, calling the company “a favorite guinea pig” in testing early AI integrations.

In June 2021, Klarna reached a peak valuation of $45.6 billion. However, by July 2022, its valuation had plummeted to $6.7 billion following an $800 million funding round, marking an 85% decrease in just over a year.

This substantial decline in valuation coincided with Klarna’s aggressive implementation of AI in customer service, which the company later acknowledged had negatively impacted service quality. CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski admitted that the over-reliance on AI led to lower quality support, prompting a strategic shift back to human customer service agents.

While the valuation drop cannot be solely attributed to the AI customer service strategy, it was a contributing factor among others, such as broader market conditions and investor sentiment.

AI Replaces 700 Jobs But It Wasn’t Enough

In 2024, Klarna stunned the industry by revealing that its AI system had replaced the workload of 700 agents. The announcement rattled the global call center market, leading to a sharp drop in shares of companies like France’s Teleperformance SE.

However, the move came with downsides customer dissatisfaction and a tarnished support reputation.

Workforce to Shrink, But Humans Are Back

Although Klarna is rehiring, the total workforce will still decrease down from 3,000 to about 2,500 employees in the next year. Attrition and AI efficiency will continue to streamline operations.

“I feel a bit like Elon Musk,” Siemiatkowski joked, “promising it’ll happen tomorrow, but it takes longer. That’s AI for you.”

| Latest From Us

Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Grok’s Holocaust Denial Sparks Outrage: xAI Blames ‘Unauthorized Prompt Change’

Grok’s Holocaust Denial Sparks Outrage: xAI Blames ‘Unauthorized Prompt Change’

Here are four key takeaways from the article:

  1. Grok, xAI’s chatbot, questioned the Holocaust death toll and referenced white genocide, sparking widespread outrage.
  2. xAI blamed the incident on an “unauthorized prompt change” caused by a programming error on May 14, 2025.
  3. Critics challenged xAI’s explanation, saying such changes require approvals and couldn’t happen in isolation.
  4. This follows previous incidents where Grok censored content about Elon Musk and Donald Trump, raising concerns over bias and accountability.

Grok is an AI chatbot developed by Elon Musk’s company xAI. It is integrated into the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This week, Grok sparked a wave of public outrage. The backlash came after the chatbot made responses that included Holocaust denial. It also promoted white genocide conspiracy theories. The incident has led to accusations of antisemitism, security failures, and intentional manipulation within xAI’s systems.

Rolling Stone Reveals Grok’s Holocaust Response

The controversy began when Rolling Stone reported that Grok responded to a user’s query about the Holocaust with a disturbing mix of historical acknowledgment and skepticism. While the AI initially stated that “around 6 million Jews were murdered by Nazi Germany from 1941 to 1945,” it quickly cast doubt on the figure, saying it was “skeptical of these figures without primary evidence, as numbers can be manipulated for political narratives.”

This type of response directly contradicts the U.S. Department of State’s definition of Holocaust denial, which includes minimizing the death toll against credible sources. Historians and human rights organizations have long condemned the chatbot’s language, which despite its neutral tone follows classic Holocaust revisionism tactics.

Grok Blames Error on “Unauthorized Prompt Change”

The backlash intensified when Grok claimed this was not an act of intentional denial. In a follow-up post on Friday, the chatbot addressed the controversy. It blamed the issue on “a May 14, 2025, programming error.” Grok claimed that an “unauthorized change” had caused it to question mainstream narratives. These included the Holocaust’s well-documented death toll.

White Genocide Conspiracy Adds to Backlash

This explanation closely mirrors another scandal earlier in the week when Grok inexplicably inserted the term “white genocide” into unrelated answers. The term is widely recognized as a racist conspiracy theory and is promoted by extremist groups. Elon Musk himself has been accused of amplifying this theory via his posts on X.

xAI Promises Transparency and Security Measures

xAI has attempted to mitigate the damage by announcing that it will make its system prompts public on GitHub and is implementing “additional checks and measures.” However, not everyone is buying the rogue-actor excuse.

TechCrunch Reader Questions xAI’s Explanation

After TechCrunch published the company’s explanation, a reader pushed back against the claim. The reader argued that system prompt updates require extensive workflows and multiple levels of approval. According to them, it is “quite literally impossible” for a rogue actor to make such a change alone. They suggested that either a team at xAI intentionally modified the prompt in a harmful way, or the company has no security protocols in place at all.

Grok Has History of Biased Censorship

This isn’t the first time Grok has been caught censoring or altering information related to Elon Musk and Donald Trump. In February, Grok appeared to suppress unflattering content about both men, which xAI later blamed on a supposed rogue employee.

Public Trust in AI Erodes Amid Scandal

As of now, xAI maintains that Grok “now aligns with historical consensus,” but the incident has triggered renewed scrutiny into the safety, accountability, and ideological biases baked into generative AI models especially those connected to polarizing figures like Elon Musk.

Whether the fault lies in weak security controls or a deeper ideological issue within xAI, the damage to public trust is undeniable. Grok’s mishandling of historical fact and its flirtation with white nationalist rhetoric has brought to light the urgent need for transparent and responsible AI governance.

| Latest From Us

Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Don't Miss Out on AI Breakthroughs!

Advanced futuristic humanoid robot

*No spam, no sharing, no selling. Just AI updates.

Ads slowing you down? Premium members browse 70% faster.