Premium Content Waitlist Banner

Digital Product Studio

Meet BEN2, the AI Background Eraser That Actually Works And It Is Open Source

Meet BEN2, the AI Background Eraser That Actually Works And It Is Open Source

Ever tried to quickly snip out the background of a photo? Maybe you wanted to put yourself in front of the Eiffel Tower (virtually, of course!), or just clean up a product shot for your online store. If you have, you probably know it can be… well, a bit of a pain. The edges can look jagged, details get lost, and sometimes it just feels like more trouble than it’s worth, right?

You know what I mean? You’re wrestling with clunky software, spending ages tweaking things, and still not quite getting that professional, clean look. It’s frustrating! Especially when you just want to make your images pop.

But guess what? Those days of background removal headaches might just be over. Because there’s a brand new player in town, and it’s shaking things up in the AI background removal world. Let me introduce you to BEN2!

What Exactly IS BEN2, and Why Should You Be Excited?

Okay, so “BEN2: New Open Source State-of-the-Art Background Removal Model” might sound a bit… technical. Let’s break it down in plain English.

Think of BEN2 as a super-smart image background eraser. But not just any eraser. This is cutting-edge AI, folks. It’s like having a digital artist who’s a total whiz at perfectly separating the foreground (that’s you, or your product, or whatever you want to keep) from the background in any image.

Benchmark illustrating the BEN2 Model, an open source architecture for advanced AI Background Removal.

And the really cool part? It’s open source. Yeah, you heard that right. This isn’t some fancy tool locked away behind a hefty subscription. BEN2 is available for everyone to use, tinker with, and build upon. That’s huge! It means more innovation, faster improvements, and ultimately, better tools for everyone.

But what makes BEN2 stand out from the crowd? What’s the secret sauce that makes it so special? Let’s get into that.

Installation Process

  1. Cloning Warehouse:
   git clone https://huggingface.co/PramaLLC/BEN2
cd BEN2
  1. Install the dependencies:
   pip install -r requirements.txt

Usage Process

  1. Import the necessary libraries and models:
   from PIL import Image
import torch
from model import BEN_Base
device = torch.device('cuda' if torch.cuda.is_available() else 'cpu')
model = BEN_Base().to(device).eval()
model.load_state_dict(torch.load('BEN_Base.pth'))
  1. Load the image and perform inference:
   image = Image.open('path_to_image.png')
mask, foreground = model.inference(image)
mask.save('mask.png')
foreground.save('foreground.png')

Confidence-Guided Matting: The Brains Behind the Beauty

This is where things get really interesting. The team behind BEN2, from PRAMA LLC (Maxwell Meyer and Jack Spruyt, hats off to you!), didn’t just tweak existing methods. They came up with a whole new approach called Confidence-Guided Matting (CGM).

“Matting”? Sounds a bit like… doormats? Not quite! In image processing, “matting” is all about getting those super-fine details right, especially around tricky areas like hair, fur, or wispy edges. It’s about making the cutout look natural and seamless, not like it was chopped out with digital scissors.

Now, usually, these image background eraser tools treat background removal and getting those fine details as separate problems. But the brains at PRAMA had a clever idea: what if we combined them? What if we used the power of “matting” techniques right from the start to make background removal way better?

What it Means?

And that’s exactly what Confidence-Guided Matting does. Think of it like this: imagine you’re trying to decide if something is foreground or background in a picture. Sometimes it’s super obvious a bright red car against a plain white wall. Easy peasy! But what about where the car meets the road? Or around the side mirrors? That’s where things get fuzzy.

CGM is smart enough to know where it’s confident about its decisions and where it’s a bit unsure. It uses this “confidence” to guide a special “refiner” part of the AI. This refiner then focuses exactly on those uncertain areas, the edges, the fine details to make the most accurate and natural cutout possible.

They built BEN2 with two main parts to make this happen:

  • BEN Base: This is like the initial sketch artist. It takes the image and makes a first guess at what’s foreground and background.
  • BEN Refiner: This is the detail master! It looks at where BEN Base was confident and, more importantly, where it was less sure. Using those “confidence trimaps” (think of them as highlighting the tricky areas), the Refiner goes to work, cleaning up edges and making everything super sharp and precise.

It’s like having a two-stage cleaning process. First, you do a general sweep, and then you go back and meticulously clean up all the corners and edges. The result? Seriously impressive background removal.

BEN2 vs. the Rest: Why This is a Big Deal

So, okay, it sounds cool. But does it actually work? According to the research paper, the answer is a resounding YES!

They tested BEN2 on a tough dataset called DIS5K. This dataset is packed with all sorts of challenging images everything from musical instruments to cars designed to really push image segmentation models to their limits. And guess what? BEN2 blew the competition out of the water.

It outperformed existing state-of-the-art methods. Models with names like MVANet and DiffDIS, which were already considered top performers got left in the dust by BEN2 and its Confidence-Guided Matting magic. Specifically, BEN2 showed “substantial improvements” on the DIS5K validation dataset. That’s tech speak for “it’s way better!”

What does this mean for you and me? It means we’re getting access to a level of AI background removal quality that was previously only in research labs. We’re talking cleaner cutouts, more professional looking images, and less frustration wrestling with editing tools. Whether you’re a photographer, a marketer, a designer, or just someone who likes to play around with photos, BEN2 is a tool worth paying attention to.

Open Source Power to the People!

Let’s not forget the open source part again, because honestly, it’s HUGE. Making BEN2 open source is a game changer for a few reasons:

  • Accessibility: Anyone can use it! No paywalls, no hidden fees. This democratizes access to top tier AI background removal tech.
  • Innovation: When something is open source, it invites collaboration. Developers around the world can dive into BEN2’s code, improve it, adapt it, and build even cooler things on top of it. Think of it as a community powered engine for progress.
  • Transparency: You can actually see how it works! No black boxes here. This is crucial for building trust in AI and understanding its capabilities and limitations.

By releasing BEN2 as open source, the creators are not just giving us a powerful tool; they’re fostering a community around it. They’re saying, “Hey, let’s work together and make this even better!” And that’s the spirit of open source at its finest.

Ready to Try it Out? (Keep an Eye Out!)

As BEN2 is brand new, details on exactly how to get your hands on it right this minute might still be emerging. Keep an eye out for updates from PRAMA LLC and the open source community. Search for “BEN2 Background Removal Open Source” online you’ll likely find links to the research paper and, soon, to the code itself.

This is more than just another image background eraser. BEN2 represents a leap forward in AI background removal, thanks to its innovative Confidence Guided Matting approach. And because it’s open source, its potential is truly limitless.

Get ready for a future where background removal is no longer a chore, but a breeze powered by the smarts of BEN2! The days of frustrating cutouts? They might just be fading into the background… for good. 

| Latest From Us

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

Stay updated with the latest news and exclusive offers!


* indicates required
Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

AI-Generated Book Scandal: Chicago Sun-Times Caught Publishing Fakes

AI-Generated Book Scandal: Chicago Sun-Times Caught Publishing Fakes

Here are four key takeaways from the article:

  1. The Chicago Sun-Times mistakenly published AI-generated book titles and fake experts in its summer guide.
  2. Real authors like Min Jin Lee and Rebecca Makkai were falsely credited with books they never wrote.
  3. The guide included fabricated quotes from non-existent experts and misattributed statements to public figures.
  4. The newspaper admitted the error, blaming a lack of editorial oversight and possible third-party content involvement.

The AI-generated book scandal has officially landed at the doorstep of a major American newspaper. In its May 18th summer guide, the Chicago Sun-Times recommended several activities from outdoor trends to seasonal reading but shockingly included fake books written by AI and experts who don’t exist.

Fake Books, Real Authors: What Went Wrong?

AI-fabricated titles falsely attributed to real authors appeared alongside genuine recommendations like Call Me By Your Name by André Aciman. Readers were shocked to find fictional novels such as:

  • “Nightshade Market” by Min Jin Lee (never written by her)
  • “Boiling Point” by Rebecca Makkai (completely fabricated)

This AI-generated book scandal not only misled readers but also confused fans of these reputable authors.

Experts Who Don’t Exist: The AI Hallucination Deepens

The paper’s guide didn’t just promote fake books. Articles also quoted nonexistent experts:

  • “Dr. Jennifer Campos, University of Colorado” – No such academic found.
  • “Dr. Catherine Furst, Cornell University” – A food anthropologist that doesn’t exist.
  • “2023 report by Eagles Nest Outfitters” – Nowhere to be found online.

Even quotes attributed to Padma Lakshmi appear to be made up.

Blame Game Begins: Was This Sponsored AI Content?

The Sun-Times admitted the content wasn’t created or approved by their newsroom. Victor Lim, their senior director, called it “unacceptable.” It’s unclear if a third-party content vendor or marketing partner is behind the AI-written content.

We are looking into how this made it into print as we speak. It is not editorial content and was not created by, or approved by, the Sun-Times newsroom. We value your trust in our reporting and take this very seriously. More info will be provided soon.

Chicago Sun-Times (@chicago.suntimes.com) 2025-05-20T14:19:10.366Z

Journalist Admits Using AI, Says He Didn’t Double-Check

Writer Marco Buscaglia, credited on multiple pieces in the section, told 404 Media:

“This time, I did not [fact-check], and I can’t believe I missed it. No excuses.”

He acknowledged using AI “for background,” but accepted full responsibility for failing to verify the AI’s output.

AI Journalism Scandals Are Spreading Fast

This isn’t an isolated case. Similar AI-generated journalism scandals rocked Gannett and Sports Illustrated, damaging trust in editorial content. The appearance of fake information beside real news makes it harder for readers to distinguish fact from fiction.

Conclusion: Newsrooms Must Wake Up to the Risks

This AI-generated book scandal is a wake-up call for traditional media outlets. Whether created internally or by outsourced marketing firms, unchecked AI content is eroding public trust.

Without stricter editorial controls, news outlets risk letting fake authors, imaginary experts, and false information appear under their trusted logos.

| Latest From Us

Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Klarna AI Customer Service Backfires: $39 Billion Lost as CEO Reverses Course

Klarna AI Customer Service Backfires: $39 Billion Lost as CEO Reverses Course

Here are four key takeaways from the article:

  1. Klarna’s AI customer service failed, prompting CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski to admit quality had dropped.
  2. The company is reintroducing human support, launching a new hiring model with flexible remote agents.
  3. Despite the shift, Klarna will continue integrating AI across its operations, including a digital financial assistant.
  4. Klarna’s valuation plunged from $45.6B to $6.7B, partly due to over-reliance on automation and market volatility.

Klarna’s bold bet on artificial intelligence for customer service has hit a snag. The fintech giant’s CEO, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, has admitted that automating support at scale led to a drop in service quality. Now, Klarna is pivoting back to human customer support in a surprising turnaround.

“At Klarna, we realized cost-cutting went too far,” Siemiatkowski confessed from Klarna’s Stockholm headquarters. “When cost becomes the main factor, quality suffers. Investing in human support is the future.”

Human Touch Makes a Comeback

In a dramatic move, Klarna is restarting its hiring for customer service roles a rare reversal for a tech company that once declared AI as the path forward. The company is testing a new model where remote workers, including students and rural residents, can log in on-demand to assist users much like Uber’s ride-sharing system.

“We know many of our customers are passionate about Klarna,” the CEO said. “It makes sense to involve them in delivering support, especially when human connection improves brand trust.”

Klarna Still Backs AI Just Not for Everything

Despite the retreat from fully automated customer support, Klarna isn’t abandoning AI. The company is rebuilding its tech stack with AI at the core. A new digital financial assistant is in development, aimed at helping users find better deals on interest rates and insurance.

Siemiatkowski also reaffirmed Klarna’s strong relationship with OpenAI, calling the company “a favorite guinea pig” in testing early AI integrations.

In June 2021, Klarna reached a peak valuation of $45.6 billion. However, by July 2022, its valuation had plummeted to $6.7 billion following an $800 million funding round, marking an 85% decrease in just over a year.

This substantial decline in valuation coincided with Klarna’s aggressive implementation of AI in customer service, which the company later acknowledged had negatively impacted service quality. CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski admitted that the over-reliance on AI led to lower quality support, prompting a strategic shift back to human customer service agents.

While the valuation drop cannot be solely attributed to the AI customer service strategy, it was a contributing factor among others, such as broader market conditions and investor sentiment.

AI Replaces 700 Jobs But It Wasn’t Enough

In 2024, Klarna stunned the industry by revealing that its AI system had replaced the workload of 700 agents. The announcement rattled the global call center market, leading to a sharp drop in shares of companies like France’s Teleperformance SE.

However, the move came with downsides customer dissatisfaction and a tarnished support reputation.

Workforce to Shrink, But Humans Are Back

Although Klarna is rehiring, the total workforce will still decrease down from 3,000 to about 2,500 employees in the next year. Attrition and AI efficiency will continue to streamline operations.

“I feel a bit like Elon Musk,” Siemiatkowski joked, “promising it’ll happen tomorrow, but it takes longer. That’s AI for you.”

| Latest From Us

Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Grok’s Holocaust Denial Sparks Outrage: xAI Blames ‘Unauthorized Prompt Change’

Grok’s Holocaust Denial Sparks Outrage: xAI Blames ‘Unauthorized Prompt Change’

Here are four key takeaways from the article:

  1. Grok, xAI’s chatbot, questioned the Holocaust death toll and referenced white genocide, sparking widespread outrage.
  2. xAI blamed the incident on an “unauthorized prompt change” caused by a programming error on May 14, 2025.
  3. Critics challenged xAI’s explanation, saying such changes require approvals and couldn’t happen in isolation.
  4. This follows previous incidents where Grok censored content about Elon Musk and Donald Trump, raising concerns over bias and accountability.

Grok is an AI chatbot developed by Elon Musk’s company xAI. It is integrated into the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. This week, Grok sparked a wave of public outrage. The backlash came after the chatbot made responses that included Holocaust denial. It also promoted white genocide conspiracy theories. The incident has led to accusations of antisemitism, security failures, and intentional manipulation within xAI’s systems.

Rolling Stone Reveals Grok’s Holocaust Response

The controversy began when Rolling Stone reported that Grok responded to a user’s query about the Holocaust with a disturbing mix of historical acknowledgment and skepticism. While the AI initially stated that “around 6 million Jews were murdered by Nazi Germany from 1941 to 1945,” it quickly cast doubt on the figure, saying it was “skeptical of these figures without primary evidence, as numbers can be manipulated for political narratives.”

This type of response directly contradicts the U.S. Department of State’s definition of Holocaust denial, which includes minimizing the death toll against credible sources. Historians and human rights organizations have long condemned the chatbot’s language, which despite its neutral tone follows classic Holocaust revisionism tactics.

Grok Blames Error on “Unauthorized Prompt Change”

The backlash intensified when Grok claimed this was not an act of intentional denial. In a follow-up post on Friday, the chatbot addressed the controversy. It blamed the issue on “a May 14, 2025, programming error.” Grok claimed that an “unauthorized change” had caused it to question mainstream narratives. These included the Holocaust’s well-documented death toll.

White Genocide Conspiracy Adds to Backlash

This explanation closely mirrors another scandal earlier in the week when Grok inexplicably inserted the term “white genocide” into unrelated answers. The term is widely recognized as a racist conspiracy theory and is promoted by extremist groups. Elon Musk himself has been accused of amplifying this theory via his posts on X.

xAI Promises Transparency and Security Measures

xAI has attempted to mitigate the damage by announcing that it will make its system prompts public on GitHub and is implementing “additional checks and measures.” However, not everyone is buying the rogue-actor excuse.

TechCrunch Reader Questions xAI’s Explanation

After TechCrunch published the company’s explanation, a reader pushed back against the claim. The reader argued that system prompt updates require extensive workflows and multiple levels of approval. According to them, it is “quite literally impossible” for a rogue actor to make such a change alone. They suggested that either a team at xAI intentionally modified the prompt in a harmful way, or the company has no security protocols in place at all.

Grok Has History of Biased Censorship

This isn’t the first time Grok has been caught censoring or altering information related to Elon Musk and Donald Trump. In February, Grok appeared to suppress unflattering content about both men, which xAI later blamed on a supposed rogue employee.

Public Trust in AI Erodes Amid Scandal

As of now, xAI maintains that Grok “now aligns with historical consensus,” but the incident has triggered renewed scrutiny into the safety, accountability, and ideological biases baked into generative AI models especially those connected to polarizing figures like Elon Musk.

Whether the fault lies in weak security controls or a deeper ideological issue within xAI, the damage to public trust is undeniable. Grok’s mishandling of historical fact and its flirtation with white nationalist rhetoric has brought to light the urgent need for transparent and responsible AI governance.

| Latest From Us

Picture of Faizan Ali Naqvi
Faizan Ali Naqvi

Research is my hobby and I love to learn new skills. I make sure that every piece of content that you read on this blog is easy to understand and fact checked!

Don't Miss Out on AI Breakthroughs!

Advanced futuristic humanoid robot

*No spam, no sharing, no selling. Just AI updates.

Ads slowing you down? Premium members browse 70% faster.